Electoral System & Structure in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)-Dr. Raju Ahmed Dipu

Saudi Arabia's political and electoral landscape has been markedly distinct from most other countries, primarily due to its unique governance system based on monarchy and Islamic law. Unlike typical democratic nations with formal electoral systems, Saudi Arabia's approach to representation and governance has evolved with significant limitations on voting rights and participation.

Overview (1900–2025)

From 1900 well into the 21st century, Saudi Arabia did not have a national electoral system characterised by formal voting processes such as First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) or proportional representation. Instead, the Kingdom has been governed by a hereditary monarchy from the House of Saud, with political authority concentrated in the hands of the royal family and senior religious leaders.

Key Features of Saudi Arabia’s Electoral and Political System

Absence of General Elections: Until recently, there were no nationwide legislative elections. Saudi Arabia does not have a parliamentary system with elected representatives in the conventional sense.

Municipal Elections: The closest form of electoral participation emerged in 2005, when municipal council elections were introduced. These elections were limited in scope and participation. Only male citizens over 18 were initially allowed to vote, and women gained the right to vote and stand as candidates starting in 2015.

Electoral System for Municipal Councils: These local elections used a majoritarian, constituency-based system, somewhat resembling a First-Past-The-Post approach. Candidates competed in single-member districts for seats on municipal councils, which have advisory powers rather than legislative authority.

Consultative Assembly (Shura Council): Saudi Arabia’s main advisory body, the Shura Council, consists of members appointed directly by the King. It has no elected representatives and serves an advisory rather than legislative function.

Specific Notes on 1948

In 1948, Saudi Arabia was under the absolute rule of King Abdulaziz Ibn Saud. The country had no electoral system, no political parties, and no form of representative democracy. Governance was conducted through royal decree and consultation with tribal and religious leaders. Thus, any form of representation was traditional and informal, not codified in electoral terms such as proportional or majoritarian systems.

Summary

1900–2005: No formal elections or voting systems. Governance was autocratic and monarchic.

2005–2025: Introduction of limited municipal elections with majoritarian voting in local constituencies.

Representation: No national legislative elections; all national governance decisions made by royal family and appointed councils.

Women’s Participation: Extended voting and candidacy rights from 2015 in municipal elections only.

Saudi Arabia’s electoral system from 1900 to 2025 cannot be described in conventional terms like First-Past-The-Post or proportional representation at the national level, as it lacked nationwide elections. The municipal council elections introduced in the 21st century represent a very limited, local-level electoral system based on a majoritarian model. The Kingdom remains an absolute monarchy with political power centralized within the royal family and religious authorities.

When Did Saudi Arabia Transition to a Multi-Party or Democratic Electoral System

Saudi Arabia remains one of the few countries in the world that has not transitioned to a multi-party or fully democratic electoral system. Unlike many nations that adopted representative democracy through multi-party elections, Saudi Arabia’s political structure is fundamentally different and deeply rooted in its monarchy and traditional governance.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, ruled by the Al Saud family, with power concentrated in the hands of the king and senior royals. The political system does not include political parties, and there are no national elections for legislative or executive offices comparable to democratic systems. Instead, governance relies heavily on royal decrees, consultative councils, and appointed officials.

The closest form of electoral process in Saudi Arabia is the municipal council elections, which were first introduced in 2005. These elections allowed Saudi citizens to vote for members of local municipal councils in some cities, marking a very limited step towards political participation. However, these councils have limited power and serve primarily in advisory roles. Importantly, political parties remain banned, and national governance decisions are made without elected parliamentary representatives.

Despite some reforms and increasing public engagement initiatives under recent leadership, Saudi Arabia has not transitioned to a multi-party or democratic electoral system. The monarchy continues to maintain centralized control over political power, with no plans announced to introduce multi-party democracy or national elections for legislative bodies.

In summary, Saudi Arabia has not experienced a transition to a multi-party or democratic electoral system. Its political framework remains an absolute monarchy with limited electoral activities restricted to local advisory councils, rather than genuine democratic representation.

National Election Results in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)

Saudi Arabia’s political system is unique in the region, characterised by an absolute monarchy with no national elections for a parliamentary legislature. Consequently, there have been no general elections or national parliamentary elections held in Saudi Arabia during the entire period from 1900 to 2025.

Political System Overview:

Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy led by the House of Saud.

There is no elected national parliament or political parties.

The country is governed by royal decrees, and political power is concentrated within the royal family.

The Consultative Assembly (Majlis ash-Shura) exists but its members are appointed by the King and do not come through elections.

Local municipal elections for some advisory councils were held in recent decades but these are limited in scope and do not reflect a national electoral process.

Election History Summary:

No national elections or political parties: Saudi Arabia does not have political parties or elected national legislative bodies.

Municipal elections: Limited municipal elections began in the early 2000s. For example, the first municipal elections allowing limited voting were held in 2005. These elections are for advisory municipal councils in some regions, and voting rights were initially restricted to male citizens, with women's participation introduced in 2015 in limited areas.

Voter turnout in these municipal elections has varied but remains a minor aspect of governance compared to national political processes.

Saudi Arabia remains an authoritarian monarchy with no competitive elections on the national level.

Example Case: General Election 1977

There was no general election in 1977 or in any other year because Saudi Arabia’s governance structure does not include elected national legislative bodies.

Saudi Arabia has never held national elections involving political parties, seats, or voter turnout as understood in conventional democratic systems. Political authority remains within the royal family, with limited, non-national electoral processes at the municipal level emerging only in the 21st century.

Political Landscape and Elections in Saudi Arabia, 1900–2025: Major Parties, Leaders, and Outcomes

Saudi Arabia’s political system from 1900 to 2025 is distinctively different from conventional electoral democracies, with no formal nationwide elections or political parties as known in many other countries. Instead, the Kingdom has functioned as an absolute monarchy, where governance and political authority are concentrated within the royal family and allied elites.

Early 20th Century: Foundation of the Kingdom

At the start of the 20th century, the Arabian Peninsula was divided into tribal territories. The House of Saud, led by Abdulaziz Ibn Saud, gradually consolidated power through military campaigns and tribal alliances, culminating in the establishment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. There were no political parties or electoral processes during this period; power was inherited and maintained through tribal loyalty and royal decree.

Political Structure: Absolute Monarchy without Parties

Saudi Arabia operates under a monarchical system where the King is the head of state and government. The royal family—the House of Saud—has dominated political life. Instead of political parties, governance relies on a network of tribal, religious, and familial allegiances, coupled with Islamic law (Sharia) as the constitutional foundation.

Because of this structure, Saudi Arabia has not held national elections for executive or legislative offices akin to those in democratic states. Instead, governance decisions are made by royal decrees, councils appointed by the King, and consultation with religious scholars and tribal leaders.

Consultative Assembly (Majlis ash-Shura)

Since 1993, Saudi Arabia has operated the Consultative Assembly (Majlis ash-Shura), a legislative advisory body whose members are appointed by the King rather than elected. The Assembly provides recommendations and advice on laws and policies but does not possess legislative power in the way parliaments in democracies do.

Local Elections: A Modest Electoral Experiment

The first significant electoral event in modern Saudi Arabia occurred in 2005 with municipal elections for local councils. These elections allowed limited voting rights, primarily for men, to select representatives for local government bodies. Women were initially excluded but were permitted to vote and run as candidates starting in 2015, a landmark moment in Saudi electoral history.

2005 Municipal Elections: Marked the first step towards political participation, though with limited scope and no national impact.

2015 Municipal Elections: Women voted and ran for office for the first time, reflecting gradual social reforms under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

However, these local elections have been limited in scale and influence, focusing on local development issues rather than national policy or leadership.

Key Leaders

King Abdulaziz Ibn Saud (r. 1932–1953): Founder of the modern Kingdom.

King Faisal (r. 1964–1975): Known for modernization efforts and asserting Saudi Arabia’s role in global politics.

King Abdullah (r. 2005–2015): Initiated cautious social and legal reforms, including the introduction of municipal elections.

King Salman (r. 2015–present): Current monarch, under whose reign significant reforms and the Vision 2030 plan have been launched.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS): De facto ruler and architect of sweeping economic and social reforms.

Outcomes and Political Stability

Saudi Arabia’s political system has remained stable and centralised, with no competitive multi-party elections or changes in ruling power via ballots. The monarchy has maintained control through a combination of traditional legitimacy, economic wealth from oil, and a strategic alliance with religious authorities.

While political parties are banned, and national elections are absent, recent decades have seen cautious openings for citizen participation at the local level, signalling slow but deliberate shifts in governance.

Summary

From 1900 to 2025, Saudi Arabia has not hosted national elections or featured political parties as seen in Western democracies. Instead, power has rested with the House of Saud and allied elites under an absolute monarchy. Local municipal elections since 2005 have provided limited electoral participation, but the Kingdom’s political outcomes have been shaped more by royal succession and reforms than by popular vote.

Electoral Violence & Violations in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)

Saudi Arabia’s political system is unique compared to many countries in the world, primarily due to its absolute monarchy and absence of national multi-party elections. This has significant implications on the nature and history of electoral processes, violence, and irregularities within the Kingdom.

Reported Irregularities and Violence

From 1900 to 2025, Saudi Arabia has not conducted national elections akin to democratic parliamentary or presidential elections, as the country operates under a monarchical system with power concentrated in the royal family. Consequently, there are no recorded instances of electoral violence or widespread election-related irregularities at the national level comparable to other democracies.

However, local municipal elections—introduced only recently in Saudi political history—have experienced limited but notable challenges. The first municipal elections were held in 2005, allowing Saudi male citizens to vote for half of the seats in local councils, marking a cautious step towards political participation.

Municipal Elections (2005–2015): These elections faced challenges such as limited voter turnout, conservative opposition to female participation, and administrative obstacles. Although violence was not reported, allegations of irregularities surfaced, including reports of voter registration issues and lack of transparency in candidate selection.

Women's Participation (2015): In the 2015 municipal elections, women were allowed to vote and stand as candidates for the first time. This historic reform was generally peaceful but highlighted social tensions, with some conservative groups opposing female participation. Despite this, no violence was reported during the electoral process.

Overall, Saudi Arabia’s elections have been characterised by limited political competition and tightly controlled processes, which have minimised public electoral violence but also restricted meaningful political expression.

Election Annulments, Delays, and Boycotts

Since the Kingdom does not hold competitive national elections, the concept of election annulment, postponement, or boycott at the national level is largely inapplicable. Nevertheless, the following points are worth noting:

Municipal Election Postponements: Municipal elections scheduled to be held every four years have occasionally been delayed or rescheduled by the government. For example, municipal elections were planned for 2019 but were postponed without a formal explanation. This reflects the cautious approach the Saudi government takes regarding local political participation.

Boycotts: There are no notable records of organised election boycotts in Saudi Arabia, primarily because elections have been limited in scope and control. Political parties are banned, and political opposition is suppressed, which restricts the emergence of boycott movements.

Summary

In summary, Saudi Arabia has experienced very limited electoral violence or irregularities due to the absence of competitive elections and political parties. The few elections held at the municipal level have been tightly controlled, peaceful, and marked more by administrative and societal challenges than by violence or major violations. There have been no annullments or significant boycotts of elections in the Kingdom’s history from 1900 to 2025.

Democracy Index & Reform: Saudi Arabia’s Electoral Democracy from 1900 to 2025

Saudi Arabia’s political landscape from 1900 to 2025 presents a unique case in the realm of electoral democracy. Unlike many nations that experienced gradual transitions towards representative governance during this period, Saudi Arabia’s journey is marked more by consolidation of monarchical authority than by democratic reforms.

Democracy Index Overview

Globally recognised democracy indices, such as the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index, consistently rank Saudi Arabia as an authoritarian regime with minimal to no electoral democracy. From the early 20th century through to the modern era, Saudi Arabia’s political system has revolved around the hereditary monarchy of the House of Saud, where power is concentrated in the royal family rather than distributed through elected institutions.

Throughout the 1900s and well into the 21st century, Saudi Arabia maintained an absence of national elections for legislative or executive offices. The concept of political parties is constitutionally prohibited, and political dissent is tightly controlled. These factors keep Saudi Arabia’s democracy score near the bottom of the scale, with the country routinely classified as a ‘hybrid regime’ or ‘authoritarian’ by democracy watchdogs.

Electoral and Political Reforms

In recent decades, some limited political reforms have taken place, but these fall short of introducing genuine electoral democracy. Notably:

Municipal Elections: Beginning in 2005, Saudi Arabia held municipal elections, the first since the country’s foundation. However, these elections were highly restricted, with only a fraction of municipal council seats elected and the rest appointed by the government. Furthermore, suffrage was initially limited to men; women were permitted to vote and run only starting in the 2015 municipal elections. These elections are often regarded as largely symbolic, with limited real political power or independence.

Consultative Assembly (Shura Council): Saudi Arabia’s advisory body, the Shura Council, is appointed by the King rather than elected. It has no legislative power and serves mainly in an advisory capacity.

Social and Legal Reforms: Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, some social reforms have taken place, including easing restrictions on women and promoting economic diversification. Yet these reforms have not translated into meaningful political liberalisation or expansion of democratic rights.

Backsliding and Challenges

While the incremental steps toward limited local elections and social reform might suggest progress, the Saudi state has simultaneously increased its suppression of political dissent, tightening control over activists, journalists, and opposition figures. Crackdowns on protests and stringent censorship have been reported consistently, underscoring a political environment hostile to genuine democratic participation.

From 1900 to 2025, Saudi Arabia’s ranking on democracy indices remained firmly in the authoritarian category, with minimal evidence of electoral democracy. Though limited municipal elections and social reforms offer some signs of change, they do not alter the fundamental nature of the country’s political system—a hereditary monarchy with little tolerance for political pluralism. The state’s tight control over political expression and absence of free, fair, and competitive elections mean that, for now, Saudi Arabia’s democratic prospects remain constrained.

Major Electoral Reforms in Saudi Arabia from 1900 to 2025

Saudi Arabia’s political system has historically been characterised by a monarchy with limited public participation in governance. However, from the early 20th century through to 2025, the Kingdom has witnessed a series of gradual but notable electoral reforms that reflect a cautious, state-managed approach to political modernisation.

Early 20th Century – Absolute Monarchy and Tribal Governance

In 1900, Saudi Arabia as we know it did not yet exist as a unified state. The region was governed by tribal leaders and local rulers. There were no formal elections, and governance relied heavily on traditional tribal consensus and the authority of the Al Saud family. The political system was entirely autocratic, with no institutionalised electoral mechanisms.

1932 – Formation of the Kingdom and Institutional Foundations

With the establishment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932 under King Abdulaziz Al Saud, the country consolidated under monarchical rule. Political participation remained restricted, and no elections were held. The King ruled with the support of religious and tribal elites, maintaining strict control over political decision-making.

1990s – Introduction of Municipal Elections

A significant development occurred in the 1990s, reflecting the Kingdom’s initial steps towards introducing electoral processes at the local level. In 1995, Saudi Arabia held its first municipal elections, allowing limited participation for male citizens to elect half of the members of municipal councils, while the other half were appointed by the government. This marked the Kingdom’s first foray into electoral politics, albeit on a very limited scale and without political parties.

2005 and Beyond – Gradual Expansion and Women’s Participation

The 2005 municipal elections expanded on the 1995 framework, continuing to elect half of the municipal council members. However, women remained excluded from voting and standing as candidates. This exclusion reflected ongoing social and political conservatism.

A landmark reform came in 2015, when women were allowed to vote and stand as candidates in municipal elections for the first time. This was a historic breakthrough in a country where gender roles had traditionally been rigid. Despite this progress, voter turnout remained low, and the elections continued to be confined to local governance, with no elections at the national level.

Shura Council and Consultative Role

Throughout the 20th and early 21st centuries, the Consultative Assembly, or Shura Council, acted as an advisory body appointed by the King. It did not have elected members, and its role was limited to providing recommendations on legislation and policies.

No National Parliamentary Elections

Saudi Arabia has never conducted national parliamentary elections. The Kingdom’s political system remains an absolute monarchy without a legislative body elected by the public. The monarchy maintains centralised control over national governance and policy-making.

Reforms from 2020 to 2025 – Political Modernisation under Vision 2030

Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030 reform plan, Saudi Arabia has embarked on a broader programme of social and economic modernisation. While there have been continued promises of political reforms, electoral changes remain incremental and largely symbolic.

Municipal elections scheduled for the early 2020s were postponed or scaled back due to the COVID-19 pandemic and shifting priorities. No new national-level electoral institutions have been established.

Nevertheless, the government has increased efforts to include citizens in consultation processes through online platforms and advisory forums, although these lack the formal democratic status of elections.

From 1900 to 2025, Saudi Arabia’s electoral reforms have been characterised by cautious, limited expansion from absolute monarchy to restricted municipal elections. The most significant milestones include the introduction of municipal elections in the 1990s and the historic inclusion of women voters and candidates in 2015. However, Saudi Arabia remains without national parliamentary elections, and political power continues to rest firmly with the monarchy. The Kingdom’s political reforms reflect a careful balancing act between modernisation and preserving traditional authority.

A Comparative Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Electoral Systems from 1900 to 2025: Which Was More Democratic

Saudi Arabia’s political and electoral landscape has been unique in the context of global governance, shaped by a distinctive blend of monarchy, religion, and limited public participation. Comparing the country’s electoral systems over the period 1900 to 2025 reveals that democracy, as conventionally understood, has largely been absent, though incremental reforms have marked subtle shifts in political engagement.

Early 20th Century: Absolute Monarchy and Absence of Electoral Processes

In the early 1900s, Saudi Arabia was under the rule of tribal leaders and the nascent House of Saud, culminating in the formal establishment of the Kingdom in 1932. During this period, there were no formal electoral systems or public voting mechanisms. Governance was based on absolute monarchy, tribal allegiances, and Islamic law, with decision-making power concentrated in the hands of the King and senior royal family members. Public participation in governance was essentially non-existent, making this era the least democratic phase in the nation’s history.

Mid-20th Century: Continued Autocracy with Limited Consultative Structures

From the mid-1900s until the late 20th century, Saudi Arabia maintained its absolute monarchy with no national elections. However, there were nascent consultative bodies such as the Majlis al-Shura (Consultative Assembly), initially appointed by the King. These bodies held advisory roles but lacked legislative authority or democratic legitimacy. No elections were held for public office, and political parties remain banned. Thus, while some institutional structures evolved, electoral democracy remained absent.

Early 21st Century: Introduction of Limited Municipal Elections

A notable shift occurred in 2005 when Saudi Arabia held its first-ever municipal elections, allowing a restricted segment of the population—male citizens over 21—to vote for half of the seats in municipal councils. These elections marked a cautious step towards political participation, albeit highly limited in scope and influence. Women were initially barred from voting or running as candidates.

The electoral system for municipal elections was based on a first-past-the-post (FPTP) model within local constituencies. However, these elections were constrained by limited powers of municipal councils, with ultimate authority resting with appointed officials and the monarchy. This development, while symbolic, did not amount to a genuine democratic system but represented the most democratic electoral practice in Saudi Arabia to date.

Recent Developments: Expansion of Participation and Women’s Inclusion

In 2015, women were allowed to vote and stand as candidates in municipal elections for the first time, marking a historic step in Saudi political reforms. The 2015 municipal elections witnessed the election of several female candidates, reflecting gradual social change and opening the door for wider citizen engagement.

Nonetheless, the electoral system remains constrained by legal and political limits. National governance remains firmly under monarchical control, with no national-level elections or parliamentary democracy. Political parties continue to be banned, and freedom of political expression is restricted.

Persistent Autocracy with Limited Democratic Experiments

Comparing Saudi Arabia’s electoral systems across the 1900-2025 timeframe reveals a consistent absence of democratic governance by international standards. The early period featured no elections and absolute monarchy; mid-century reforms introduced advisory bodies without electoral legitimacy; and early 21st-century reforms allowed limited municipal elections with restricted suffrage and authority.

The most democratic phase within this timeline is arguably from 2005 onwards, coinciding with the introduction of municipal elections and the inclusion of women voters and candidates. However, these reforms remain limited and controlled within the framework of an absolute monarchy.

Thus, Saudi Arabia remains an autocratic state with cautious, incremental electoral experiments that fall far short of full democracy. The 2005-2025 period shows the most democratic elements in Saudi Arabia’s electoral history, though these are modest and tightly circumscribed.

Which Countries Had Their First Democratic Election in the 20th Century and Under What System?

The 20th century witnessed sweeping democratic transformations across the globe, as empires fell, colonies gained independence, and republics emerged. Many nations held their first democratic elections during this period, adopting a variety of electoral systems influenced by historical, cultural, and geopolitical circumstances. Below is a regional breakdown of notable countries that held their first democratic elections in the 20th century, along with the systems they used.

Europe

Germany (1919)

Following the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany transitioned into the Weimar Republic. Its first democratic election in 1919 used proportional representation (PR) with a party list system—one of the earliest examples of full PR in Europe.

Spain (1931 – Second Republic)

Spain’s first democratic election under the Second Republic was held in 1931, using majoritarian block voting in multi-member constituencies. The monarchy had been dissolved, and universal male suffrage was introduced (followed by female suffrage in 1933).

Portugal (1911)

After the revolution that ended the monarchy, the 1911 election established the First Portuguese Republic. The system used was plurality voting (FPTP-like) in multi-member districts with restricted suffrage initially, expanded gradually in the 20th century.

Africa

Ghana (1951)

The Gold Coast (now Ghana) held its first democratic election in 1951, becoming the first sub-Saharan African colony to do so. It used a limited franchise under British oversight, employing a constituency-based majoritarian system (similar to FPTP). Full universal suffrage followed in the 1956 election.

Nigeria (1959)

Nigeria’s 1959 general election was the first held under a constitution that allowed self-government. It used FPTP in single-member constituencies, influenced by the British Westminster system.

Asia

India (1951–52)

After independence, India’s first general election was a monumental affair using first-past-the-post (FPTP) across hundreds of constituencies. It remains the world’s largest democratic exercise.

Japan (1946)

Following WWII, Japan held democratic elections under a new constitution introduced by the American occupation. The 1946 election used limited suffrage block voting, transitioning to a multi-member SNTV system in subsequent years.

Indonesia (1955)

Indonesia’s 1955 election was its first national democratic vote after independence from the Dutch. It adopted a proportional representation system, with a national and regional list-based structure.

Americas

Mexico (1917)

Following the Mexican Revolution, the 1917 election was held under a new constitution. Although nominally democratic and using FPTP, elections remained dominated by one party (PRI) for decades, making it a partial democracy.

Argentina (1916)

After the Sáenz Peña Law (1912), Argentina’s 1916 election was the first under universal male suffrage and secret ballot, employing FPTP in single-member districts.

Oceania

Papua New Guinea (1964)

Papua New Guinea held its first democratic election in 1964 under Australian administration, using preferential voting (instant-runoff voting), a system still in use today.

Middle East

Turkey (1923)

The Republic of Turkey held its first election in 1923, transitioning from the Ottoman Empire. Initially using a two-tier majoritarian system, it moved to full multiparty democracy with PR in the 1950s.

Israel (1949)

Israel's first national election in 1949 used a pure nationwide proportional representation system, which it retains to this day.

The 20th century was a defining era for global democratisation. Countries adopted varied electoral systems—from first-past-the-post to proportional representation, block voting, and preferential systems—shaped largely by colonial legacies, local politics, and international influences. While many of these democracies faced early setbacks, their first elections laid the groundwork for modern political systems that continue to evolve today.

Timeline of Major Elections and Key Political Events in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)

1902

Reclamation of Riyadh
Abdulaziz Ibn Saud recaptures Riyadh, marking the beginning of the unification of the Saudi state. No elections, but this event lays the foundation for the modern Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

1932

Establishment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia is officially unified and declared a kingdom under Ibn Saud. Political power is consolidated in the monarchy, with no elections held.

1953

Accession of King Saud
King Saud takes the throne following Ibn Saud’s death. Political reforms are minimal and no electoral institutions exist.

1992

First Municipal Elections
Saudi Arabia holds its first-ever municipal elections. Only men are allowed to vote and run as candidates. This is the first step towards limited local electoral participation, though candidates must be vetted by the government.

2005

First Municipal Elections with Women’s Participation Promised
The government announces that women will be allowed to vote and run in future elections, signalling gradual social reforms.

2011

Arab Spring and Political Reforms
Amid regional unrest, Saudi authorities promise further reforms, including expanding municipal elections and increased political participation, though progress remains limited.

2015

First Municipal Elections with Women Voters and Candidates
Women participate in Saudi Arabia’s municipal elections for the first time, marking a historic milestone in the kingdom’s political development.

2017

Continued Social and Political Reforms
Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, reforms accelerate, but no new national-level elections are introduced. The monarchy maintains strict control over political processes.

2020–2025

Ongoing Political Environment
No national parliamentary or legislative elections take place. Municipal elections remain the only electoral process, limited in scope and influence. The political system remains an absolute monarchy with advisory councils but no elected national legislature.

Summary:
From 1900 until the present, Saudi Arabia has maintained a highly centralised, absolute monarchy without national-level elections. The political system is dominated by the royal family, and democratic institutions are limited. The kingdom’s first municipal elections were held in 1992, representing a cautious step towards participatory governance at the local level. Women were first allowed to vote and run in these elections in 2015, a landmark social reform. Despite promises of greater political openness, no parliamentary elections or broader democratic reforms have occurred. Saudi Arabia’s electoral process remains tightly controlled, reflecting the kingdom’s traditional governance structure.

Major Global Electoral Events That Reshaped Democracy in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)

Saudi Arabia’s political landscape from 1900 to 2025 is marked by a unique trajectory compared to many other nations, as it has historically functioned as an absolute monarchy with limited electoral processes. However, several key events, reforms, and developments over this period have influenced governance structures and the modest progression towards participatory politics.

Early 20th Century: Formation of the Saudi State

1902 – Founding of the Third Saudi State
The modern Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was founded by Abdulaziz Ibn Saud in 1902, after recapturing Riyadh. This marked the consolidation of power rather than the establishment of electoral democracy, setting the stage for a monarchical rule based on tribal and religious legitimacy rather than popular elections.

Mid-20th Century: Institutional Foundations

1932 – Official Formation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
The unification of the various tribal territories into a single kingdom further centralized royal authority. Formal political institutions remained limited, with no elections or parliamentary system established.

1953 – Succession of King Saud
The transition of power through royal succession remained internal, with no electoral or public participation involved.

Late 20th Century: Initial Political Reforms and Consultative Assemblies

1992 – Establishment of the Shura Council
In a significant development, King Fahd introduced the Consultative Assembly of Saudi Arabia (Majlis ash-Shura) in 1992. While members were appointed rather than elected, the council was intended to advise the King on policy matters, representing an embryonic step towards institutional governance.

1997 – Municipal Council Elections Begin
Saudi Arabia held its first municipal elections in 1997, marking the first occasion where some degree of electoral participation was introduced. However, voting was limited to male citizens only, and the powers of elected councils were highly restricted.

Early 21st Century: Gradual Expansion of Electoral Participation

2005 – Municipal Elections Resume
After a hiatus, municipal elections resumed in 2005 with greater organisation. These elections remained the primary form of electoral process available to citizens, limited in scope and authority.

2011 – Regional Impact of the Arab Spring
The wave of uprisings and demands for democratic reforms across the Middle East during the Arab Spring prompted Saudi authorities to announce reforms, increased social spending, and minor political concessions to maintain stability. However, major democratic reforms or national elections did not materialise.

Recent Developments (2015–2025): Incremental Reforms and Women’s Political Participation

2015 – First Municipal Elections Allowing Women to Vote and Run
A historic reform came in 2015 when women were allowed, for the first time, to vote and stand as candidates in municipal elections. This milestone was a significant step towards increasing political participation in a highly conservative society.

Vision 2030 and Political Modernisation Efforts
Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030 reform plan, efforts have been made to modernise various sectors including governance. Though still limited, there are ongoing discussions about expanding participatory governance and enhancing the role of advisory bodies.

Summary

While Saudi Arabia has not experienced traditional electoral revolutions or democratic transitions, several events between 1900 and 2025 reflect gradual, controlled attempts at political participation reform within an absolute monarchy framework. The introduction of the Shura Council, municipal elections, and especially women’s enfranchisement in 2015 represent cautious but important steps shaping the Kingdom’s governance trajectory.

CSV-Style Table: General Elections in Saudi Arabia (1900-2025)

Saudi Arabia does not hold national parliamentary elections. The listed elections are municipal-level and advisory councils only.

An Overview of General Elections in Saudi Arabia (1900–2025)

Saudi Arabia, as an absolute monarchy since its foundation in 1932, has not held national elections akin to those in democratic systems. From 1900 until the establishment of the modern Kingdom, the House of Saud consolidated control through tribal alliances and military campaigns, with no formal electoral system in place.

Between 1932 and the early 2000s, the Kingdom’s political structure remained highly centralised under royal authority, with no political parties or parliamentary elections. The major national issues during this era centred on unification, economic development fuelled by oil wealth, and maintaining internal stability.

The Kingdom’s first steps towards electoral participation came in 2005 with municipal elections, which were limited in scope and primarily advisory. Voter turnout was approximately 50%, reflecting cautious public engagement under tight political controls.

By 2015, municipal elections expanded to include more women voters for the first time, signalling incremental reforms. Turnout hovered around 47%, showing steady, if limited, local political participation.

The 2020 municipal elections occurred amid the COVID-19 pandemic, slightly reducing turnout to roughly 44%. Despite these modest openings, Saudi Arabia remains a monarchy without national legislative elections. Political reforms continue to be driven from the top, with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman spearheading various social and economic changes aimed at modernisation while maintaining royal dominance.

Looking ahead to 2025, no national parliamentary elections are planned, and the Kingdom is expected to continue its cautious approach to political participation, balancing stability with controlled reform.

Global Electoral Trends in Saudi Arabia: 1900 to 2025

1900s–1930s: Absolute Monarchy and Absence of Electoral Processes
During the early 20th century, Saudi Arabia was under the rule of tribal leaders and later consolidated by Ibn Saud, who established the Kingdom in 1932. There were no formal electoral processes or representative institutions. Governance was highly centralized, rooted in absolute monarchy and tribal customs, with no signs of democratization or electoral reforms.

1940s–1960s: Consolidation of Monarchical Authority
The Kingdom expanded its territorial control and consolidated royal authority. Although modern state institutions began emerging, political power remained concentrated in the hands of the monarchy and elite families. There was no introduction of elections or democratic governance structures, reflecting an era of authoritarian consolidation.

1970s–1980s: Limited Consultative Institutions without Elections
During this period, Saudi Arabia established the Consultative Council (Majlis ash-Shura) in 1993, intended to advise the King. However, the Council members were appointed rather than elected, indicating no electoral innovation or movement towards democratization. The government maintained strict control over political participation.

1990s: Initial Steps Toward Political Consultation
The 1990s saw modest reforms, such as expanding the advisory role of the Consultative Council and allowing limited municipal elections starting in 2005. These municipal elections were among the few electoral innovations but were tightly controlled, with restrictions on candidates and voters. The Kingdom remained an authoritarian monarchy with no national-level elections.

2000s: Controlled Electoral Experimentation and Gender Inclusion
The introduction of municipal elections marked a small step toward limited public participation. In 2015, women were allowed to vote and run as candidates in municipal elections for the first time, a significant milestone for inclusion but within a highly restricted electoral framework. Overall, democratization remained minimal, with political power firmly retained by the monarchy.

2010s–2025: Authoritarian Resilience Amidst Social Reforms
Despite continued social and economic reforms under Vision 2030, including some liberalisation in cultural and social spheres, the political system remains authoritarian. No national elections exist; the monarchy continues to appoint key officials and control political life. The Kingdom has shown resilience against democratic pressures, with electoral rollbacks at the national level and tight control over political expression.

Summary

From 1900 to 2025, Saudi Arabia has shown almost no democratisation or genuine electoral innovation at the national level. While municipal elections introduced limited participation, these remain tightly controlled and symbolic. The Kingdom’s political system remains a hereditary absolute monarchy with authoritarian governance and no meaningful electoral democracy. Social reforms and limited inclusivity advances coexist with an enduring lack of national elections and political pluralism.

How to Request Humanised Outputs in a Narrative and Analytical Tone

To craft compelling, reader-friendly content with depth and context, it's crucial to frame your prompts in a way that encourages analytical thinking and storytelling. Below are some guiding principles and practical examples tailored for ElectionAnalyst.com:

Use Role-Based Prompts (e.g., Political Analyst, Historian, Journalist)

These personas help shape the voice, vocabulary, and structure of the response.

Example:

“Write like a political analyst explaining why the 2006 election in Saudi Arabia was controversial.”
(Outcome: Objective yet critical analysis, referencing political dynamics, reforms, or religious influences.)

“Summarise the 1900 Eastern European elections in a journalistic tone.”
(Outcome: Factual, concise narrative with headlines, key facts, and quotes.)

Include Time, Place, and Political Context

Mentioning specific dates, regions, and systems will make the output more focused and historically grounded.

Example:

“Explain the electoral system used in San Marino in 1948. Was it proportional, majoritarian, or mixed?”
(Outcome: A precise breakdown of electoral mechanisms within that period.)

“Describe the impact of Cold War tensions on Czechoslovakia’s 1946 elections.”
(Outcome: Integrated political context, showing how external forces influenced domestic outcomes.)

Structure for Data-Focused Readers: CSV Prompts for Election Datasets

Use structured prompts to generate timeline tables with high editorial clarity.

Example:

“Create a CSV-style table showing general elections in Belarus from 1900 to 2025 with columns: Year, System, Ruling Party, Turnout, Major Issue.”
(Outcome: Neatly formatted, digestible data for quick comparative analysis.)

Ask for Comparisons, Trends or Patterns

This helps reveal deeper electoral insights rather than isolated facts.

 Example:

“Compare the electoral turnout trends in Egypt between 1952 and 2020.”

“How did voting patterns change in post-independence African countries in the 1960s?”

Request Specific Tones or Styles

Directly state the tone you want: academic, conversational, historical, satirical, etc.

 Example:

“Write a neutral academic-style article about the 1994 South African general election.”

“Write in a narrative style, explaining how Kenya’s 2007 election triggered political unrest.”

“Write like a [role] explaining how [event] in [year] affected [outcome], using a [tone] style.”

Example:
“Write like a political historian explaining how the 1989 Polish election led to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, using a narrative tone.”

Disclaimer – ElectionAnalyst.com

ElectionAnalyst.com is a globally accessible, independent civic research and data analysis platform, authored by Dr. Raju Ahmed Dipu, Global Policy Analyst, Politician, and Social Entrepreneur. This platform presents election-related information, systems, results, and democratic developments from 1900 to 2025 for all recognized countries, with the goal of fostering public education, research, and transparency.

1. Educational and Civic Purpose

All content on ElectionAnalyst.com is produced for:

Academic and policy research

Civic engagement and democratic awareness

Historical and journalistic reference

The website is not affiliated with any electoral commission or government agency, nor does it advocate for specific political ideologies, parties, or governments.

2. No Legal or Political Liability

All data is presented in good faith, derived from public records, historical archives, and expert analysis.

ElectionAnalyst.com and its author do not accept legal responsibility for any unintended inaccuracy, interpretation, or third-party misuse of data.

The platform does not intervene in any national electoral process, nor does it provide services for electoral litigation, consulting, or political campaigning.

3. User Responsibility and Contributions

Any public comment, suggestion, or submission remains the sole legal responsibility of the contributor.

Users and researchers must independently verify content before relying on it for official, legal, or governmental use.

4. Copyright Protection

All intellectual content on this site is the property of Dr. Raju Ahmed Dipu and protected under:

© 2025 ElectionAnalyst.com | All Rights Reserved

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works

EU Digital Services Act (DSA)

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

WIPO Copyright Treaty

Content may be cited for non-commercial use with attribution, but may not be copied, sold, scraped, or used for AI training without prior written consent.

5. International Legal Protection

This platform is legally shielded by:

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Freedom of Expression)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 10

European Union Fundamental Rights Charter

As such:

No foreign government, political party, or institution may impose legal threats, censorship, or data requests on this platform unless presented through verified, lawful international mechanisms such as EU data court orders or UN-recognised tribunals.

6. Content Challenges & Dispute Process

If any individual or institution believes that content is:

Factually incorrect

Unlawfully infringing

Violating rights

You may submit a formal complaint with valid documentation to:

legal@electionanalyst.com

Our legal team will review and respond accordingly under applicable international law.

Official Contact:
 Email: editor@electionanalyst.com
 Website Author: Dr. Raju Ahmed Dipu (Analyst, Exiled Politician, International Business Law Specialist)

Email: dipu@countrypolicy.com